Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Insightful. Independent. Innovative.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Reading Time: 2 minutes
Today, Federal Chairman Jerome Powell addressed members of Congress to update them on the economy, inflation, and reasons for increasing the federal fund’s rate. Since your time is valuable, I have summarized and paraphrased the 2.5 hour meeting.
As you likely are aware, the Federal Reserve announced that it would be raising interest rates 0.75 percentage points, following its June 14-15 meeting, bumping the federal funds rate to a target range of 1.50 to 1.75 percent.
The Federal Reserve has two mandates: maximum sustainable employment and price stability.
After watching Federal Chairman Jerome Powell share his comments on inflation before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs today, here is what I heard:
The Federal Reserve increasing the federal funds rate causes the following:
Recent record inflation started before the Ukraine invasion and blaming it solely on Russia is not fair, nor correct.
The Federal Reserve decreasing the federal funds rate does not really affect the price of gas (energy) and food.
Fuel at the pump is primarily driven by two things: 1) prices set globally by large oil producing countries and cartels and 2) the oil refinement spread to convert oil into usable products (such as gas at the pump). Neither is controlled, nor can be controlled by the Federal Reserve.
Employment is extremely tight—meaning that the portion of candidates to available jobs is low and the competition to hire them can be fierce. Chairman Powell said that currently, there are two job vacancies for every one person looking for work.
According to Chairman Powell, the financial conditions and markets have already priced in the future anticipated interest rate increases that the Fed has indicated they will be doing over the foreseeable future. He said that markets are reading the Fed’s response well. According to the schedule, the Fed interest rates will likely be around 3.0% to 3.5% by the end of the year.
Powell, after listening to several Congressmen and Congresswomen share their constituent’s concerns about inflation, had this to say the following which I have paraphrased: Inflation destroys public confidence. We are using our tools and the public should believe that we will get it down to 2% over time. We can help with the demand side and can slow down the demand of goods and services by raising the federal interest rates.
Consumers have healthy balance sheets and continue to spend due to their savings. Consumers make up a healthy portion of our GDP. No one is very good at forecasting recessions and can’t do it consistently.
The Federal Reserve Board and board members have a tough job ahead of them. Their goal is to get inflation under control by dampening the demand for goods and services to allow the supply side to recover post-Pandemic. If they raise rates too high or too quickly, it could send the U.S. economy into a recession. If they don’t do anything, inflation can remain elevated and get into American’s psyche.
To learn more and to listen to our podcast on this subject, click here.
If you are still concerned about your portfolio and how much risk you may have in your portfolio, or whether you are on track to achieving your financial goals, please click here to schedule a no obligation coffee or call with us.
[gview file=”https://investedwithyou.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Powell-Testimony-6-22-22.pdf”]
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Reading Time: 2 minutes
On today’s Intelligent Money Minute, we’ll interview Ed Peters on signs of risk and business cycles. During this episode, Ed talks about risk regimes that are out in the market and how they lead to different business cycles. We can’t know truly know when risk regimes are shifting, but we can keep an eye on converging risks. For the first time in a long time, we are seeing a rise in both real inflation risk and business cycle risk.
Risk comes in cycles and follows the business cycle. We can look for signs that different seasons are coming as Ed mentioned. Looking at credit rate risks, interest rate risks, etc… you can see risks rising and falling. It is never crystal clear, and not foolproof due to the fact there are exogenous shocks that can change the outlook overnight. At Intelligent Investing, we don’t want to be naïve, but we have faith in our future. We regard optimism as the only realism. There will always be something to fear, but we think that progress continues to increase. Think back to your childhood and all the technology that has changed since then. We want to maintain a positive outlook on life, even when things appear dark or grim. To learn more about our wealth management principles and philosophy, please visit our philosophy page.
Be sure to subscribe to our podcasts so you can stay informed. We’d be happy to sit down with you over coffee or a call to share our process and philosophy and how we manage risk for our high-net-worth clients.
Ed Peters is First Quadrant’s Managing Partner. In this role, Ed establishes the firm’s strategic direction, develops firm-wide initiatives, and chairs the Executive Leadership Team and the Management Operating Committee. Ed also contributes to First Quadrant’s research efforts, with a particular emphasis on market states, and manages the firm’s long-only multi-asset strategy. Prior to joining First Quadrant in 2008, Ed worked at PanAgora Asset Management, at various times serving as equity portfolio manager, Director of Tactical Asset Allocation, CIO of Macro Investments, and CIO. Other past work experience includes Interactive Data Corporation and Mutual Benefit Life. Ed holds an MBA from Rutgers University. He has published articles in multiple investment journals, as well as three books.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Reading Time: < 1 minute
On today’s Intelligent Money Minute, we’ll interview Ed Peters on how to hedge against stagflation. In previous episodes, Ed stresses how correctly diagnosing the inflationary environment is critical to approaching an accurate economic solution. During this inflation series, Ed Peters defined reflation, deflation, and stagflation. Stagflation is defined as persistently high inflation combined with high unemployment and stagnant demand in a country’s economy. Outside of shorting, Ed explains the challenges a stagflation environment poses for any investor.
As Ed mentioned, the Fed has found itself in a tricky spot. A prudent investor will not want to guess and hope for the best regarding the Fed’s next move. On our next episode with Ed, we’ll talk about various risk regimes and what we should be aware of. Be sure to subscribe to our podcasts so you can stay informed. We’d be happy to sit down with you over coffee or a call to share our process and philosophy and how we manage risk for our high-net-worth clients.
Ed Peters is First Quadrant’s Managing Partner. In this role, Ed establishes the firm’s strategic direction, develops firm-wide initiatives, and chairs the Executive Leadership Team and the Management Operating Committee. Ed also contributes to First Quadrant’s research efforts, with a particular emphasis on market states, and manages the firm’s long-only multi-asset strategy. Prior to joining First Quadrant in 2008, Ed worked at PanAgora Asset Management, at various times serving as equity portfolio manager, Director of Tactical Asset Allocation, CIO of Macro Investments, and CIO. Other past work experience includes Interactive Data Corporation and Mutual Benefit Life. Ed holds an MBA from Rutgers University. He has published articles in multiple investment journals, as well as three books.